Juventus winger Juan Cuadrado scored a late goal that finally wrapped up the points against Cagliari which served as a reminder that there’re no easy games in Serie A.Speaking after netting the third goal in Saturday’s 3-1 success at Allianz Stadium, the Colombian said via Juventus official website:“We know we can’t afford to lower our game in Serie A because all the other teams are desperate to get a result against us and pull out all the stops when they play us.”“I’m happy because we got the three points tonight and that’s all that matters.”Fiorentina owner: “Ribery played better than Ronaldo!” Andrew Smyth – September 14, 2019 Fiorentina owner Rocco Commisso was left gushing over Franck Ribery’s performance against Juventus, which he rates above that of even Cristiano Ronaldo’s.“We’re not setting any limits. We want to keep improving with every game. We know that’s what we have to do if we want to keep growing as a team.”Cuadrado made his senior international debut in 2010 and has since earned over 70 caps.Being part of the Colombian squads which reached the quarter-finals at two Copa América tournaments 2011, 2015 and the 2014 FIFA World Cup, he contributed to his nation’s third-place finish at the Copa América Centenario.
Post a comment Sep 1 • iPhone 11, Apple Watch 5 and more: The final rumors Share your voice reading • Apple says witness tampering charges justified. Qualcomm has said no way Qualcomm Apple Aug 31 • iPhone XR vs. iPhone 8 Plus: Which iPhone should you buy? Aug 31 • Your phone screen is gross. Here’s how to clean it • 0 Tech Industry Aug 31 • Best places to sell your used electronics in 2019 Qualcomm and Apple are in trial over patents in San Diego, California. Richard Nieva/CNET Apple and Qualcomm continued feuding over alleged witness tampering, as the iPhone maker reiterated Tuesday it had reason to suspect its key witness had been influenced ahead of his testimony at a patent infringement trial in San Diego.In a filling on Tuesday, Apple counsel Juanita Brooks wrote that the iPhone maker had grounds to suspect someone was trying to sway Arjuna Siva’s testimony, though she said the company doesn’t know who. The iPhone maker has argued that Siva, a former Apple engineer, co-invented technology in one of three disputed Qualcomm patents and should be named on it.”Apple had good reason to be concerned that steps were being taken to influence Mr. Siva’s testimony,” Brooks wrote in the filing.When Apple first made the allegation last week, Qualcomm said it was “ridiculous” and vigorously denied the claim. Judge Dana Sabraw, who is presiding over the case, also said there was “no evidence” for the allegation.Siva, who now works at Google, testified on Monday after Apple said last week he was no longer intending on appearing in court. He said many elements of a boot-up technology covered by the patent were “my idea,” but stopped short of claiming he was an inventor. The controversy over Siva’s appearance has been a source of drama in what is an otherwise highly technical patent case. Qualcomm alleges Apple infringed on its patents in the development of some versions of the iPhone. One of those patents allows a smartphone to quickly connect to the internet once the device is booted up.Apple alleged witness tampering last week when Siva seemingly backed out of his appearance after retaining new counsel. The new lawyer, Matt Warren, advised Siva against attending if he hadn’t been subpoenaed. Apple suggested foul play because Warren was formerly a partner at Quinn Emanuel, the firm currently representing Qualcomm. Last week, Apple filed subpoenas for both Siva and Warren to appear in San Diego. Warren, Siva’s new counsel, had also retained an attorney of his own.On Monday, Warren’s counsel wrote in a letter filed to the court that the witness tampering claims were “baseless.” In the letter, Warren’s counsel said that Google, Siva’s current employer, had arranged for Warren to be Siva’s independent counsel. He said Google had only learned of Siva’s expected testimony last Wednesday, and that asking for a subpoena was a “routine request.”In the court filing, Brooks said Apple’s defense had worked with Siva for months before “things changed.” Still, she said Siva’s testimony had been consistent with the original plans, so she saw no reason for “further action” regarding Siva’s testimony.The San Diego patent trial is only the part of a long-running legal saga between Apple and Qualcomm. The two companies will meet in court again in April to argue over royalties for technology in iPhones. Apple See All Tags
Many individuals look for legitimate work-at- house jobs. Several of those individuals look for a home based task being a separate essay journalist. They could have had training experience and desire to help pupils compose their papers, or these are generally thinking about becoming posted authors and also this is one means they could boost their writing and make additional income during the same time. A home based job as an essay journalist might appear such as a ideal work. But additionally there are specific downsides to it.
Composing from your home – Advantages
Being employed as an essay that is independent gives you freedom. You’ll work online from anywhere. You’re not restricted up to a desk within an workplace all day long. The task provides the choice of composing from any location: in the home or other destination with internet access.